Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Training to be A Secretary?

Just updating what I have been doing behind the scene :P
Creating & updating a Gantt Chart regularly.
It's a job that requires more than a discipline but also good memory, honesty and a heart full of care.
Since I'm a left-brained person (proven by so many tests on the net), I kinda enjoy doing this.
It's systematic. No fuss about it. Just have to do it every week then it's all done and dusted.
 Now now... I'm training my left brain muscles hard hey?
Maybe I'll be a good secretary one day ;)


Case Study 2.1.4 Lockers and Other Facilities in Singapore Public and Private Schools

Primary and secondary institutions in Singapore are grouped into public and private schools. Despite the same curriculum being carried out, facilities on each school varies from one to another. This case study will compare and contrast the school facilities in  Nanyang Girls’ High School (public) and St. Francis Methodist School (private) as well as looking into Endeavour Primary School’s (private) No Heavy Bag Programme.
Nanyang Girls’ High School (NGHS) classrooms are redesigned to fit 21st century teaching process. One of the new facilities is individual lockers inside the classroom to store students’ belonging. Recently, NGHS also runs Prototype 21st Century class (P21C2) by creating technology-based environment and interactive lessons. iPad is used as the main tool of learning process which requires students to carry iPad to school. Books are replaced by iPad during P21C2 lessons. Another facility that NGHS offers is Mac Lab, however, it is not opened for students to use at anytime.

Facilities provided by schools can help students for better organizing the content of their school bags. For instance, unnecessary textbooks or items can be left inside the lockers instead of having to bring it back and forth from home to school.
Similar to NGHS, St. Francis Methodist School provides lockers facility and I.T labs. The lockers, however, are not owned by the school, therefore, students who wish to rent a locker must pay extra fees of $40/year. Unlike NGHS Mac lab, the I.T labs in St. Francis Methodist School are opened for students to use at any school hours.
Endeavour Primary School is an example of schools in Singapore to have the ‘No Heavy School Bag programme’ that was first developed in 2008 and implemented the pilot phase in 2009 and 2010. Intending to resolve the issue on children having heavy school bag, the programme involves setting up class rooms to have virtual environment with hands-on activities which means that activities are carried out with digital resources available in the classrooms. Most school subjects such as English language, Chinese language, Malay language, Mathematics, Science and Art are carried out in these virtual classrooms which requires students to bring no text books to school.
The No Heavy School Bag (NHSB) lessons are conducted using e-book software Koobits through which students are encouraged to create stories by imagination to share with the class at the end of day as well as some other softwares like Audacity that is used to record student’s oral reading. Students’ response to this programme is very positive. Nirohshaa Chandra Shaharan, primary 5 pupil comments, “Thursday is my favourite school day, it's the day for No Heavy School Bag Malay lessons, which are very fun and challenging, especially when I create my own stories and make them different from everyone else's."
Currently, the NHSB programme is only applicable for primary 3 to 5 students and is ran once a week. A large part of teaching process is still carried out in standard classrooms. However, the school plans to apply the programme on a larger scale in the near future. Other than the NHSB programme, the school website does not mention about other facilities such as locker facility, thus, it can be assumed that it has no other facilities that aids in tackling heavy school bag problem. 
 1111.jpg
 
From the students’ positive response to this NHSB programme, curriculum similar to this can be designed as a possible solution to heavy school bag problem. However, the designing process will need a further research and observation on how NHSB programmme is conducted in reality.

Sunday, 23 March 2014

BEST 4

Down to BEST 3 ideas from our crazy 101 ideas.

1. Helium bag/trolley bag
2. Robotic backbone
3.Lockers with online reminder system
4. Online class system

So we decided to choose HELIUM BAG!
I'm excited for it! So we are going to do research for how it's gonna look like and what materials are suitable :)

Thursday, 20 March 2014

Survey Data Analysis

Objective & Method
An online survey is conducted using the Surveymonkey.com to question primary and secondary students about their opinions on heavy school bag. The objective of this survey is to understand the problem from student’s point of view.
The survey is conducted in one week period and all members are responsible in distributing the survey. Participants’ age range is set between 7 - 17 years old. The sample size is set to a minimum of 100 people with an expectancy of a good mixture of both primary and secondary students in Singapore and overseas. Due to large age range of the sample group, questions were written as simple as possible to minimize the chance of misunderstanding (see Appendix 1). The survey is set out with three choices of answer, this is to enable answers to be easily tabulated for a better data analysis.

Survey Result and Analysis
The survey was distributed to students in Indonesia and China due to lack of access to Singaporean primary and secondary students. In total, there were 124 respondents to the survey, however, standard membership on Surveymonkey only allows 100 responses to be shown and analyzed.
From the result, a significant 92% of the respondents (fig 2.2a) is comprised of secondary students aged 13 - 17 years old. Due to this, the survey result is considered to reflect the opinions of the dominant group only.
The responses received for question 3 (fig 2.2b) show uniformity on the answers. Out of one hundred students, thirty nine of them feel that their bags are very heavy on regular basis; similarly thirty four say their bags are heavy on occasion days. While twenty nine say their bags are heavy on most days. This shows that most students do feel that their bags are very heavy. The answers to other possible determinants of heavy school bag questions such as number of lessons in a day;  the length of time taken to travel from home to school and the frequency of having to carry additional equipments, may suggest the significance of these determinants in causing the heavy bag problem.
The collected answers to the question of number of lessons in a day are rather evenly distributed (fig), hypothetically it is only a small percentage of 39% having to carry the most books to school since they have more than four lessons per day. So this determinant only affects a small group of people, thus, it cannot be said to be the major cause of the issue


It is also the same in the case of the students’ travel time from home to school (fig 2.2d). Nearly half of the students take around fifteen to thirty minutes travel, 21% of them take less than fifteen minutes and 33% take more than thirty minutes. There is a tendency that students live not so close to school by looking at the time taken to travel, however, it depends largely on the method of transportation taken to measure how severe the consequences of heavy school bag on the students. By walking or taking public transportation, students have to carry their bags for a longer time, thus, consequences are greater on their body.
For the frequency of carrying additional school tools or equipments (fig 2.2e), majority of students (42%) admit that only sometimes they have to carry extra things apart from books for their lessons, however, quite a big number of students (32%) also say that they have to carry extra personal belongings on daily basis such as water bottles, wallet, lunchbox, calculator, phone charger, iPad, etc. Most of them explain on their comments to the question “The things inside your bag usually,” that these are necessities.
Students, however, are aware of the consequences of this issue. 86.21% out of one hundred respond that they know about the negative impacts on their physical health from carrying heaving bag in long-term (fig 2.2f). Although students understand the risks, they are reluctant to take any actions to resolve the issue.  “No time to pack, just bring everything to school, “and “Don’t see the point in packing.” these two comments to the question “Do you pack your own bag?” (fig 2.2g) are the evidences of what some students think about properly packing their bags. Students also feel that their parents are not concerned about this issue and take no action to resolve it (fig 2.2h). Parents seem to be more concerned about this issue on younger children as evidenced on the case study of parents’ and teachers’ opinion in newspaper articles. The case study shows that the media relates the issue to primary school students while excluding older secondary students completely, making the issue biased to them. The media tendency to see it as primary students’ issue may explain market low response in providing ergonomics school bag for secondary students (see case study 2.1).



Similarly, majority of students feel that their school and teachers have done nothing to help reduce their bag’s weight. Out of one hundred, only fifteen feel their teachers tried to prevent them from carrying too heavy bags (fig 2.2i). From the comments (fig 2.2j & 2.2k), some students say show how teachers try to help in solving this issue. It varies from advising students of what to bring the next day to allowing them to leave books under the table.




Conclusion
Overall, the answers to the survey conclude that secondary school students are physically suffering from the weight of their bags. Despite being aware of the consequences it may cause, these students are still carrying heavy bags and majority of them feel that teachers and parents are not doing anything to solve this problem.
One of the ways that this survey can be further improved is by tailoring more specific questions that source out clearer answer. For example, instead of asking the frequency of carrying extra things, the question can be changed to ‘Do you carry electronic gadgets and other extra things other than books to school everyday?” Also the choices of answer should be more distinct, for instance, rare, sometimes and everyday can be the choices instead of sometimes, often and everyday. 

Wednesday, 19 March 2014

Plan with details now = suffer less later

Time to update our report again.
I'm doing the analysis for our survey result and during the process I started to realise how inefficient the questions that we made were.
Some questions were not detailed enough which cause ambiguity in the answers.

For instance the question
"How long do you usually take to travel from home to school?"
The travel time does affect how long students have to carry their bags BUT only in the case if they are walking or travelling by public transports with no seats. The question doesn't take into account factors like method of transportation which causes answers to be biased and I must say invalid. But... we just assume that majority of them are walking/taking public transportation to make their answers valid.

Another problem that I found is that I cannot make much comparison and linkage between all the questions. I suppose good survey questions are able to get answers that support/contrast each other.
It's a bit hard to do but I still can make some links :)

Lesson learned here: be clear and detailed with survey question to make analysis easier.